For my personal taste I dont think the Quake is as good. It seems strange that they release a smaller and cheaper model only after the Pro 50 has been on the market. It is almost 1kg lighter than the Pro 50 and so I do not think as well made. It really is a simple as that.įor the record I have seen and heard a Quake which has just been launched and yet to be reviewed. The great thing is that the High and Low level inputs can be connected at the same time and only the gain controls need to be altered. In this case I use the Low level lead and take the output from the sub out on the Sony amp I have and feed it to the 2 subs. I also use the 2 Pro 50s with my cinema setup. Theres never been any hint of boom from the Pro50s so you will not have this to deal with. Once this was done you can turn them both on and they are just about right. Then with only one turned on at a time I played a track I was familiar with and tweaked the controls until the sub was just coming into play. I used the High Level input to connect each sub on its own to the amplifier output on the speaker terminals. The setting up of my 2 Pro 50s was a breeze. Not jack of all trades like the others perhaps thats why the Kefs dont perform. Both are British companies and both specialise in Subwoofers. Anyway there really is only 2 manufacturers to choose from. What swayed me was the ethos behind those guys at MJA who seem to have been on our side of the fence for the most part. To be honest I thought long and hard about who to support when I bought my subs. Sorry to here that you have had such a problem with your setup. You may find my respponce of some interest. The chap had got 2 Kefs he was not happy with and wanted to upgrade. Having recently posted some comments about the Pro 50 subwoofer from M J Acoustics I received a request for question about using either the Quake or Pro 50.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |